The Importance of Colposcopic Biopsy in Cervical Smear Pathologies Colposcopic Biopys in Cervical Screening
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 362-365
December 2019

The Importance of Colposcopic Biopsy in Cervical Smear Pathologies Colposcopic Biopys in Cervical Screening

Med Bull Haseki 2019;57(4):362-365
1. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kadın-Doğum Polikliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 16.01.2019
Accepted Date: 14.02.2019
Publish Date: 10.12.2019
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Aim:

To evaluate the results of colposcopy-guided biopsy in patients diagnosed with low- and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) identified by Pap smear test.

Methods:

A total of 102 patients with low- and high-grade CIN diagnosed by Pap smear test, who underwent colposcopy-guided biopsy in the gynecology and obstretrics outpatient clinics at Haseki Tranining and Research Hospital, were included in this retrospective study.

Results:

One hundred and two patients were included in our study. Colposcopy-guided biopsy results of patients with low-grade and high-grade CIN were as follows: acanthosis and chronic cervicitis-36 (50%) and five (16%), CIN I - 28 (38%) and nine (30%), and CIN II-III - 8 (11%) and 16 (53%), respectively. The specificity and sensitivity of colposcopy-guided biopsy in detecting CIN II-III in patients with high-grade CIN were 67% and 80%, respectively, and the positive predictive value was 50%.

Conclusion:

Considering the fact that smear is a screening test, the diagnosis of low-grade and high-grade CIN should be confirmed with colposcopy-guided biopsy.

References

1Company A, Montserrat M, Bosch FX, Sanjose S. Training in the prevention of cervical cancer: advantages of e-learning. Ecancermedicalscience 2015;9:580.
2Tanabodee J, Thepsuwan K, Karalak A, et al. Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:7381-4.
3Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M, et al. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286:1549-54.
4Labani S, Asthana S. Age-specific performance of careHPV versus Papanicolaou and visual inspection of cervix with acetic acid testing in a primary cervical cancer screening. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016;70:72-7.
5Poomtavorn Y, Suwannarurk K. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic Acid in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pre-and post-menopausal thai women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;16:2327-31.
6Kingnate C, Supoken A, Kleebkaow P, Chumworathayi B, Luanratanakorn S, Kietpeerakool C. Is Age an Independent Predictor of High-Grade Histopathology in Women Referred for Colposcopy after Abnormal Cervical Cytology? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;16:7231-5.pidemiol Community Health 2016;70:72-7.
7Keskin HL, Secen EI, Tas EE, Kaya S, Avsar AF. Servikal smear sitolojisi ile kolposkopi eşliğinde servikal biyopsi korelasyonu. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 2011;3:71-5.
8Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cyto-logic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:810-9.
9Hilal Z TC, Schiermeier S, Reinecke J, Ruppenkamp C, Hilal Z. Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015;75:1051-7.
10Underwood M, Arbyn M, Parry-Smith W, et al. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2012;119:1293-301.
11Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson H W, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Patho-logy, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the pre-vention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:147-72.
12Moss EL, Hadden P, Douce G, Jones PW, Arbyn M, Redman CW. Is the colposcopically directed punch biopsy areliable diagnostic test in women with minor cytologicallesions? J Low Genit Tract Dis 2012;16:421-6.
13Tantitamit T, Termrungruanglert W, OranratanaphanS, Niruthisard S, Tanbirojn P, Havanond P. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Management Strategiesfor Detection CIN2+ of Women with AtypicalSquamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS)Pap Smear in Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;16:6857-62.
14Pouliakis A, Karakitsou E, Chrelias C, et al. The Application of Classification and Regression Trees for the Triage of Women for Referral to Colposcopy and the Estimation of Risk for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Study Based on 1625 Cases with Incomplete Data from Molecular Tests. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015:914740.
15Dunn TS, Burke M, Shwayder J. A ‘‘see and treat” management for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion pap smears. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2003;7:104-6.
16Davey DD, Neal MH, Wilbur DC, Colgan TJ, Styer PE, Mody DR. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:1224-9.
17Jones BA, Davey DD. Quality management in gynecologic cytology using interlaboratory comparison. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:672-81
18Saha R, Thapa M. Correlation of cervical cytology with cervical histology. KUMJ 2005;3:222-4.
19Oya Soylu Karapınar, Kenan Dolapçıoğlu, Cahit Özer. Servikal premalign lezyonlarda kolposkopinin yeri. Türk jinekolojik onkoloji dergisi 2015;4:131-6.
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House