Problems About the Use of C-Arm Fluoroscopy in Proximal Femoral Nailing Surgery
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 209-212
September 2018

Problems About the Use of C-Arm Fluoroscopy in Proximal Femoral Nailing Surgery

Med Bull Haseki 2018;56(3):209-212
1. İstanbul Metin Sabancı Baltalimanı Kemik Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye
2. Selçuk Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye
3. İstanbul Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 24.10.2017
Accepted Date: 18.01.2018
Publish Date: 20.09.2018
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Aim:

It was aimed to determine the amount of wasted time and radiation exposure in intertrochanteric femur fracture surgeries for the use of C-arm fluoroscopy device during surgery.

Methods:

Records of 62 patients sustaining femur intertrochanteric fracture who were treated with closed reduction and internal femoral fixation were evaluated. Total operative time, time wasted for the use of C-arm fluoroscopy device use, number of shots done, surgeon’s seniority, number of shots performed until the desired image was obtained, number of guide wire applications made before implant placement and total amount of fluoroscopy images were recorded by the assistant healthcare personnel.

Results:

It was found that 53% of the operative time was wasted for the use of the C-arm fluoroscopy device, the average number of fluoroscopy scans to obtain true anteroposterior and lateral images of a specific level was 10, and the guide wire could be placed in the desired position after– an average of 3.7 attempts.

Conclusion:

We believe that C-arm fluoroscopy devices should be used by trained technical personnel, a common language of terms should be established between the surgeon and the X-ray technician and more practical imaging units should be improved in order to shorten the duration of surgery and to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.

References

1
Nordell E, Jarnlo GB, Jetsén C, Nordström L, Thorngren KG. Accidental falls and related fractures in 65-74 year olds: a retrospective study of 332 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:175-9.
2
Rodop O, Mahiroğullari M, Tirmik U, Keklikçi K, Sen H. [The increasing incidence of interthrocanteric fractures synchronous with older age]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2009;20:131-5.
3
Jiamton C, Boernert K, Babst R, Beeres FJP, Link BC. The nail-shaft-axis of the of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) is an important prognostic factor in the operative treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018;138:339-49.
4
Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury 2002;33:395-9.
5
5. Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury 2010;41:810-7.
6
Park SY, Yang KH, Yoo JH, Yoon HK, Park HW. The treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary hip nail. J Trauma 2008;65:852-7.
7
Li YY, Hsu RW, Cheng CC, Huang TJ. Minimally invasive vertebroplasty managed by a two C-arm fluoroscopic technique. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007;16:350-4.
8
De Muinck Keizer RJ, Klei DS, Van Koperen PJ, Van Dijk CN, Goslings JC. “Turn laterally to the left!”. The need for uniform C-arm communication terminology during orthopaedic trauma surgery. Acta Orthop Belg 2017;83:146-52.
9
Flierl MA, Stahel PF, Hak DJ, Morgan SJ, Smith WR. Traction table-related complications in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18:668-75.
10
Nakamura J, Hagiwara S, Orita S, et al. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty with a novel mobile traction table -a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18:49.
11
Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:433-44.
12
Benoit B, Gofton W, Beaulé PE. Hueter anterior approach for hip resurfacing: assessment of the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am 2009;40:357-63.
13
Woolson ST, Pouliot MA, Huddleston JI. Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: short-term results from a community hospital. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:999-1005.
14
Loder RT, Aronsson DD, Dobbs MB, Weinstein SL. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Instr Course Lect 2001;50:555-70.
15
Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, Conlan LB, Wild L, McKee MD. Femoral intramedullary nailing: comparison of fracture-table and manual traction a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1514-21.
16
Giachino AA, Cheng M. Irradiation of the surgeon during pinning of femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980;62:227-9.
17
Williams TH, Syrett AG, Brammar TJ. W.S.B.--a fluoroscopy C-arm communication strategy. Injury 2009;40:840-3.
18
Stone ME Jr, Barbaro C, Bhamidipati CM, Cucuzzo J, Simon R. Elderly hip fracture patients admitted to the trauma service: does it impact patient outcome? J Trauma 2007;63:1348-52.