Effect of the Position on Hemodynamic Parameters in Elective Cesarean Sections with Spinal Anesthesia: A Retrospective Clinical Trial
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 85-90
March 2019

Effect of the Position on Hemodynamic Parameters in Elective Cesarean Sections with Spinal Anesthesia: A Retrospective Clinical Trial

Med Bull Haseki 2019;57(1):85-90
1. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, İstanbul Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 12.07.2018
Accepted Date: 23.07.2018
Publish Date: 19.03.2019
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Conclusion:

We concluded that in elective cesarean sections, maternal hypotension in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia with 15°C tilt position on the left side of the patient is seen less than in patients undergoing in the supine position. In addition, starting with a 15°C tilt position and changing position to the supine position, make a deeper hypotension and increase the dose of ephedrine used.

Results:

The hemodynamic values in group S were significantly lower than in group T, and a total of 43 patients were administered ephedrine. It was found that in group TT, only four of 40 patients required ephedrine and the total dose was lower than in other groups.

Methods:

Data on the 133 elective caesarean sections done in 2017 was examined. Hemodynamic parameters, table position, use of ephedrine, need for additional drugs, and nausea and vomiting were recorded. Surgery started in the supine position in 64 patients (group S), and in the tilt position in 69 (group T). Group T was subdivided into 2 groups: group TS consisted of 29 patients in whom surgery started in the tilt, and continued in the supine position and group TT included 40 patients in whom the surgery was completed in the tilt position.

Aim:

Maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia is the most common complication. We aimed to compare the haemodynamic effects of patient positions (supine or tilt) applied to avoid spontaneous hypotension in elective cesarean sections performed in our clinic with spinal anesthesia by examining the files of anesthesia records retrospectively.

References

1Göktuğ A, Özayar E, Oba Ş, Uysalel A. Sezaryen Olgularında Uygulanan Rejyonel Anestezi Tekniklerinin Yan Etkilerinin Sonuçları. Türk Anest Rean Der 2007;35:145-51.
2Günüsen İ, Karaman S, Akercan F, Fırat V. Elektif sezaryenlerde farklı anestezi yöntemlerinin yenidoğan üzerine etkileri: retrospektif çalışma. Ege Tıp Dergisi 2009;48:189-94.
3McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ. General anaesthesia for emergency caesarean delivery: is the time saved worth the potential risks? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;52:311-22.
4Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1992;76:906-16.
5McCrae AF, Wildsmith JA. Prevention and treatment of hypotension during central neural block. Br J Anaesth 1993;70:672-80.
6Jackson R, Reid JA, Thorburn J. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1995;75:262-5.
7Şahin Ş, Owen MD. Ağrısız Doğum ve Sezaryende Anestezi. Nobel & Güneş Kitabevi; 2006. p. 92.
8Carvalho, B. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. IARS review course lectures 2006:23-30.
9Muench MV, Canterino JC. Trauma in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007;34:555-83.
10Boisseau L. Care of pregnant patients undergoing nonobstetric surgery. AORN J 2012;96:635-46.
11Shaver SM, Shaver DC. Perioperative assessment of the obstetric patient undergoing abdominal surgery. J Perianesth Nurs 2005;20:160-3.
12Erdem MK, Özgen S, Coşkun F. Obstetrik Anestezi ve Analjezi. İçinde: Kişnişçi H, Gökşin E, editörler. Temel Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Bilgisi. Ankara: Melisa Matbaacılık; 1996. p. 173-86.
13Erdine S. Sinir Blokları. İstanbul: Emre Matbaacılık; 1993. p. 9-24.
14Yegül İ. Obstetride Rejyonal Analjezi ve Anestezi. VI. Uludağ& Kış Sempozyumu, 5-8 Aralık 1996, Bursa: Özet Kitabı; 1996. p. 80-5
15Esener Z. Pediatrik Anestezi. Ankara: Feryal Matbaacılık; 1995. p: 5-55.
16Morgan PJ, Halpern SH, Tarhis J. The Effects of an Increase of Central Blood Volume Before Spinal Anesthesia for Ceserian Delivery: a qualitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2001;92:997-1005.
17Okutan M, Kocamanoğlu İS, Şener B, Karakaya D, Sarıhan B, Tür A. Sezaryen cerrahisi için uygulanan spinal anesteziyle ilişkili hipotansiyonun önlenmesi. TARD Dergisi 2006;34:27-34.
18Critchley LA. Hypotension, subarachnoid block and the elderly patient. Anaesthesia 1996;51:1139-43.
19Farine D, Seaward PG. When it comes to pregnant women sleeping, is left right? J Obstet Gyneacol Can 2007;10:841-2.
20Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, Ekeroma Aj, Zuccollo JM, McCowan LM. Association between maternal sleep practices and risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study. BMJ 2011;342:3403.
21Kinsella SM, Lee A, Spencer JA. Maternal and fetal effects of the supine and pelvic tilt positions in late pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gyneacol Reprod Biol 1990;36:11-7.
22Ellington C, Katz VL, Watson WJ, Spielman FJ. The effect of lateral tilt on maternal and fetal hemodynamic variables. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:201-3.
23Qu LR, Kan A, Masahiro N. Fetal circulation in relation to various maternal body positions. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 1994;29:589-91.
24Ryo E, Okai T, Kozuma S, Kobayashi K, Kikuchi A, Taketani Y. Influence of compression of the inferior vena cava in the late second trimester on uterine andumbilical artery blood flow. Int J Gyneacol Obstet 1996;55:213-18.
25Armstrong S, Fernando R, Columb M, Jones T. Cardiac index in term pregnant women in the sitting, lateral, and supine positions: an observational, crossover study. Anesth Analg 2011;113:318-22.
26Balki M, Carvalho JC. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2005;14:230-41.
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House