ABSTRACT
Aim:
Acute abdominal syndrome (AAS) defines the failure to establish the primary diagnosis rather than being a definitive diagnosis. The fact that many patients are discharged from the hospital without surgical intervention as well as the decision regarding which patients should undergo surgery and when, all may create a dilemma for the clinician.
Methods:
We analyzed and recorded the data of 50 randomly chosen patients with a primary diagnosis of AAS who had been hospitalized in the emergency surgical department for follow-up. The study group was compared with a control group (50 patients) who had been directly operated on for AAS without a preceding observation. The parameters used in the study were age, gender, guarding, rebound tenderness, ultrasonography, leucocytosis, and left shift of the neutrophils.
Results:
The mean age of the patients in the study group was statistically significantly higher than that in the control group and surgery was not necessary in 88%.Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for guarding, rebound tenderness, ultrasonography, and gender. Logistic regression analysis revealed that rebound tenderness and ultrasonography results were more valuable than the other parameters. Rebound tenderness and ultrasonography influenced the decision for surgical intervention by 7.9- and 17.3-fold increases, respectively.
Conclusion:
We think that our parameters can be used as a guide by clinicians working in emergency departments to decide which patient should be operated on since only 12% of the study group had necessitated surgical intervention.
Keywords:
Acute abdomen, guarding, leucocytosis, \r\nUltrasonography\r\n
References
1Oertli D. Acute Abdomen-Injured Abdomen. Postgraduate Course. In: Proceedings of the Montreux, Switzerland, 2007. p. 1-15.
2de Dombal FT. The OMGE acute abdominal pain survey progress report. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1988;144:35-42.
3Irvin TT. Abdominal pain: a surgical audit of 1190 emergency admissions. Br J Surg 1989;76:1121-5.
4Wilson DH, Wilson PD, Walmslay RG. Prognosis of acute abdominal pain in accident and emergency department. Br J Surg 1977;64:249-52.
5Leung AKC, Sigalet DL. Acute Abdominal Pain in Children. American Family Physician 2003;67:2321-6.
6Doshi M, Heaton KW. Irritable bowel syndrome in patients discharged from surgical wards with nonspesific abdominal pain. Br J Surg 1994;81:1216-8.
7Fales WD, Overton DT. Abdominal pain. In: Tintinalli JE, Ruiz E. Emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide. 4th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 1996. p. 217-21.
8de Dombal FT. Acute abdominal pain--an O.M.G.E. survey. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1979;14:29-43.
9Lukens TW, Emerman C, Effron D. The natural history and clinical findings in undifferentiated abdominal pain. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:690-6.
10Kraemer M, Franke C, Ohmann C, Yang Q; Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group. Acute abdominal pain in late adulthood: incidence, presentation, and outcome. Results of a prospective multicenter acute abdominal pain tudy and a review of the literature. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000;385:470-81.
11Özgüç H, Çakın N, Duman U. Akut nonspesifik karın ağrılı olguların bir yıllık prognozları, semptom ve bulgularının tanısal doğruluğu. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2008;14:118-24.
12Raheja SK, McDonald PJ. Nonspesific abdominal pain-an expensive mystery. J R Soc Med 1990;83:10-1.
13Sheridan WG, White AT. Nonspesific abdominal pain: the resource implications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1992;74:181-5.
14Pines J, Uscher Pines L, Hall A, Hunter J, Srinivasan R, Ghaemmaghami C. The interrater variation of ED abdominal examination findings in patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23:483-7.
15Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Chen WK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ. Laboratory tests in patients with acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 2006;76:71-4.
16Eryılmaz R, Şahin M, Alimoğlu O, Baş G, Özkan OV. Negatif apendektomileri önlemede c-reaktif protein ve lökosit sayımının değeri. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2001;7:142-5.
