E-ISSN: 2147-2688
Assesment of the Approach to the Painless Delivery: A Survey Study
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 57 ISSUE: 2
P: 180-184
June 2019

Assesment of the Approach to the Painless Delivery: A Survey Study

Med Bull Haseki 2019;57(2):180-184
DOI: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2018.4602
Duygu Demiröz Aslan 1
Neslihan Altunkaya 2
Ayşe Gül Ferlengez 1
1. İstanbul Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye
2. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, Malatya, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 07.08.2018
Accepted Date: 18.12.2018
Publish Date: 27.03.2019
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Aim:

Being able to relieve pain that occurs during delivery provides physical and emotional involvement of the mother in the birth and could reduce maternal and fetal undesirable effects. We planned this questionnaire study to evaluate the painless delivery approaches of physicians working in the fields of gynecological diseases and obstetrics.

Methods:

A survey was made consisting of 10 questions about the painless delivery approaches with the gynecologists and obstetricians in Turkey. Ninety-eight physicians’ answers were evaluated.

Results:

It was observed that the painless birth in the clinics was not widespread, the low painless delivery options offered rate was low and the informing was inadequate in clinics throughout Turkey. In addition, it was concluded that physicians did not have a common idea to the effect on the action of delivery.

Conclusion:

The role of gynecologists and obstetricians, as well as anesthesiologists, is great in spreading painless delivery practice. We also wanted to emphasize that informing the patient during pregnancy by the gynecologic diseases and obstetricians may reduce the rate of cesarean delivery due to the patient’s request.

References

1Duman Z, Köken NG, Şahin FG, Coşar E, Arıöz DT, Aral İ. Sağlık çalışanlarının normal doğum ve sezaryen ile ilgili düşünceleri. Perinatol Derg 2007;15:1-7.
2Mc Donald JS, Obstetric pain. In: McMahon SB, Koltzenburg M, editors. Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pain. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 793-816.
3Miller RD. Miller’s anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 16.
4Erdine S. Ağrı. İstanbul:Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2007. p. 142.
5Özyuvacı E. Doğum ağrısı mekanizma ve kontrolünde güncel kavramlar. Klinik Gelişim. İstanbul Tabip Odası; 2007. p. 46-52.
6Erdine S. Obstetrik anestezi ve analjezi uygulamaları. Rejyonal Anestezi. İstabul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi: 2005. p. 253-70.
7Paul RH, Miller DA. Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1903-7.
8Yumru E, Davas İ, Baksu B, Altındaş A, Mert M. 1995-1999 yılları arasında sezaryen operasyonu endikasyonları ve oranları. Perinatoloji Dergisi 2000;8:3-4.
9Bonica JJ. The nature of the pain of parturition. In: Bonica JJ, McDonald JS, editors. Principles and practice of obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. 2nd ed. Williams and Wilkins; 1995. p. 243-73.
10Burke D, Henderson DJ, Simpson AM, et al. Comparison of 0.25% S(-)-bupivacaine with 0.25% RS-bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth 1999;83:750-5.
11Leighton BL, Halpern SH. Epidural analgesia: effects on labor progress and maternal and neonatal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2002;26:122-35.
12Gomar C, Fernandez C. Epidural analgesia-anaesthesia in obstetrics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17:542-58.
13Lurie S, Matzkel A. Epidural anesthesia shortens duration of labor in singleton vertex presentation spontaneous delivery. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;17:203-5
14Writer WD, Stienstra R, Eddleston JM, et al. Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery after epidural analgesia for labour with ropivacaine and bupivacaine: a prospective meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 1998;81:713-7.
15Konakcı SK, Kılıc B. İzmir’de sezaryen ile doğum sıklığı ve buna etki eden faktorler. Turkiye Klinikleri Obstetrik-Jinekoloji 2004;14:88-95.
16Konakçı S, Kılıç B. Sezaryen ile doğumlar artıyor. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi 2002;8:286-8
17Bailit JL, Love TE, Mercer B. Rising cesarean rates: are patients sicker. Am J Gynecol 2004;191:800-3.
18Başara BB, Güler C, Yentür GK, et al. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2014, Sağlık Araştırmaları Genel Müdürlüğü, Sağlık Bakanlığı, Ankara 2015:63.
19Fisher C, Hauck Y, Fenwick J. How social context impacts on women’s fears of childbirth: A Western Australian example. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:64-5.
20Kasai KE, Nomura RM, Benute GR, de Lucia MC, Zugaib M. Women’s opinions about mode of birth in Brazil: Aqualitative study in a public teaching hospital. Midwifery 2010;26:319-26.
21Dölen İ, Özdeğirmenci Ö. Optimal sezaryen hızı ne olmalı? Türkiye’de ve Dünyada güncel ne? TJOD Uzmanlık Sonrası Eğitim Derg 2004;7:113-7.
22World Health Organization. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a Geneva:WHO;2009URL:http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publicat ions/2009/9789241547734_eng.pdf. February 24, 2014
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House